ALL >> Legal >> View Article
Dui Arrests And Inventory Searches
In Kilburn vs. State, the First District Court of Appeal was presented with two distinct issues. The Defendant filed 2 separate motions to suppress. The 1st motion to suppress was filed alleging that the officer didn't have reasonable suspicion to stop the automobile. The 2nd motion to suppress was filed alleging that, after the defendant was arrested for DUI, the drugs found in his vehicle should be suppressed because the inventory search wasn't carried out in accordance with standardized criteria.With regard to the first motion to suppress, the trial court found that the deputy observed defendant's pick-up truck weaving and crossing lanes over a distance of roughly 2 1/2 miles. The deputy suspected that this was a DUI case. After activating his emergency lights, defendant didn't stop immediately. When defendant did stop, he almost hit a trash can. Defendant was then arrested for felony DUI because of the fact that this was defendant's fourth DUI. The trial court denied this motion to suppress and the appellate court affirmed finding that defendant's argument had no merit.After arresting defendant for DUI, the deputy ...
... made the decision to have defendant's truck towed since it was in an unsafe location. As a part of the impoundment procedure, the deputy conducted an inventory search of the truck pursuant to Sheriff's Office policy. During the inventory search, the deputy found marijuana, alprazolam and hydrocodone. The premise for the 2nd motion to suppress was that the Sheriff's Office had no standardized criteria or procedures for conducting an inventory search. The trial court denied the motion to suppress. The appellate court reversed the trial court's decision. The appellate court held that in order for the inventory search exception to the warrant requirement to apply, the inventory search has to be performed in accordance with standardized criteria. The stated purpose is "to limit police discretion in determining the scope of the search and ensures that the police will not abuse the exception and use the inventory search as a subterfuge for a criminal investigatory search."Daniel Rosenberg is a DUI Attorney located in Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida. For further information, please call (954)356-0413 or visit the following link:
Add Comment
Legal Articles
1. Iim Bangalore, Iit Madras Release Joint Report On India’s Evolving Startup Incubation LandscapeAuthor: Dev kumar
2. How Non-canadians Can Enter The Us From Canada
Author: Hardik Shah
3. Cyber Crime Lawyer In Ahmedabad - Advocate Deepak: Leading Expertise In Digital Justice
Author: Advocate Deepak
4. Us Visa Interview Waiver - Know In And Out
Author: Hardik Shah
5. From Suffering To Success: How To Find Your Belmar Slip And Fall Lawyer
Author: blognerdzone
6. Best Cyber Crime Lawyer In Noida – Advocate Deepak
Author: Advocate Deepak
7. Importance Of Business Reforms Action Plan 2024 For Ease Of Doing Business
Author: Dev kumar
8. 2026 Diversity Visa Lottery Opens For 55,000 Green Cards
Author: Berd & Klauss, PLLC
9. Canadian Citizenship Police Certificate: A Detailed Guide
Author: Hardik Shah
10. How Long Do You Have To File An Injury Claim In Dallas County: A Comprehensive Guide
Author: Morgan Scott
11. Essential Advice For Divorce In The Uk: What To Expect From Your Lawyer
Author: Rainer Hughes
12. Bail Lawyer In Cyber Crime Case In Delhi – Advocate Deepak: Your Trusted Legal Partner
Author: Advocate Deepak
13. Chicago Personal Injury Lawyers
Author: Paul M. Marriett
14. The Bruner Law Firm
Author: Vince Bruner
15. Bail Lawyer In Cyber Crime Cases In Noida: Advocate Deepak
Author: Advocate Deepak