ALL >> Legal >> View Article
Dui Arrests And Inventory Searches
![Profile Picture](https://www.123articleonline.com/images/avatar-default.jpg)
In Kilburn vs. State, the First District Court of Appeal was presented with two distinct issues. The Defendant filed 2 separate motions to suppress. The 1st motion to suppress was filed alleging that the officer didn't have reasonable suspicion to stop the automobile. The 2nd motion to suppress was filed alleging that, after the defendant was arrested for DUI, the drugs found in his vehicle should be suppressed because the inventory search wasn't carried out in accordance with standardized criteria.With regard to the first motion to suppress, the trial court found that the deputy observed defendant's pick-up truck weaving and crossing lanes over a distance of roughly 2 1/2 miles. The deputy suspected that this was a DUI case. After activating his emergency lights, defendant didn't stop immediately. When defendant did stop, he almost hit a trash can. Defendant was then arrested for felony DUI because of the fact that this was defendant's fourth DUI. The trial court denied this motion to suppress and the appellate court affirmed finding that defendant's argument had no merit.After arresting defendant for DUI, the deputy ...
... made the decision to have defendant's truck towed since it was in an unsafe location. As a part of the impoundment procedure, the deputy conducted an inventory search of the truck pursuant to Sheriff's Office policy. During the inventory search, the deputy found marijuana, alprazolam and hydrocodone. The premise for the 2nd motion to suppress was that the Sheriff's Office had no standardized criteria or procedures for conducting an inventory search. The trial court denied the motion to suppress. The appellate court reversed the trial court's decision. The appellate court held that in order for the inventory search exception to the warrant requirement to apply, the inventory search has to be performed in accordance with standardized criteria. The stated purpose is "to limit police discretion in determining the scope of the search and ensures that the police will not abuse the exception and use the inventory search as a subterfuge for a criminal investigatory search."Daniel Rosenberg is a DUI Attorney located in Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida. For further information, please call (954)356-0413 or visit the following link:
Add Comment
Legal Articles
1. Internet Scam LawyerAuthor: Advocate Deepak
2. Online Fraud Legal Expert
Author: Advocate Deepak
3. Certificate Attestation In Qatar: A Complete Guide For Expats
Author: Helpline Group
4. Expert Cyber Crime Advocate
Author: Advocate Deepak
5. Degree Certificate Attestation For Employment Visa
Author: Fayaz
6. Top Cyber Crime Attorney In Delhi
Author: Advocate Deepak
7. Cyber Fraud Lawyer In Noida
Author: Advocate Deepak
8. Criminal Defense And Human Rights: Advocating For Fair Treatment Globally
Author: Roderman & Johnston
9. In What Ways Can A Consultant Help Navigate The Complexities Of Indian Regulations Related To Bis Certification?
Author: Diligence Certifications
10. Best Advocate For Bail Matters In Delhi
Author: Advocate Deepak
11. Experienced Bail Lawyer In Delhi For Speedy Bail
Author: Advocate Deepak
12. How To Appeal A Criminal Conviction In Delhi
Author: Patrons Legal
13. Affordable Bail Lawyer In Delhi Ncr
Author: Advocate Deepak
14. Top Bail Lawyers In Delhi High Court
Author: Advocate Deepak
15. Ready To Work In The Uk? Explore Visa Options That Don't Need A Job Offer
Author: SmartMove2UK