ALL >> Legal >> View Article
Dui Arrests And Inventory Searches
In Kilburn vs. State, the First District Court of Appeal was presented with two distinct issues. The Defendant filed 2 separate motions to suppress. The 1st motion to suppress was filed alleging that the officer didn't have reasonable suspicion to stop the automobile. The 2nd motion to suppress was filed alleging that, after the defendant was arrested for DUI, the drugs found in his vehicle should be suppressed because the inventory search wasn't carried out in accordance with standardized criteria.With regard to the first motion to suppress, the trial court found that the deputy observed defendant's pick-up truck weaving and crossing lanes over a distance of roughly 2 1/2 miles. The deputy suspected that this was a DUI case. After activating his emergency lights, defendant didn't stop immediately. When defendant did stop, he almost hit a trash can. Defendant was then arrested for felony DUI because of the fact that this was defendant's fourth DUI. The trial court denied this motion to suppress and the appellate court affirmed finding that defendant's argument had no merit.After arresting defendant for DUI, the deputy ...
... made the decision to have defendant's truck towed since it was in an unsafe location. As a part of the impoundment procedure, the deputy conducted an inventory search of the truck pursuant to Sheriff's Office policy. During the inventory search, the deputy found marijuana, alprazolam and hydrocodone. The premise for the 2nd motion to suppress was that the Sheriff's Office had no standardized criteria or procedures for conducting an inventory search. The trial court denied the motion to suppress. The appellate court reversed the trial court's decision. The appellate court held that in order for the inventory search exception to the warrant requirement to apply, the inventory search has to be performed in accordance with standardized criteria. The stated purpose is "to limit police discretion in determining the scope of the search and ensures that the police will not abuse the exception and use the inventory search as a subterfuge for a criminal investigatory search."Daniel Rosenberg is a DUI Attorney located in Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida. For further information, please call (954)356-0413 or visit the following link:
Add Comment
Legal Articles
1. Safeguard Your Child's Future With Top Legal Representation In DelhiAuthor: Nidhi Rajoura
2. How To Choose The Best Fingerprinting Agency In Edmonton
Author: Hardik Shah
3. Best Corporate Lawyers In Delhi: Navigating Business Success With Expert Legal Guidance
Author: Advocate Rahul Bhardwaj
4. Key Considerations In Uk Commercial Transactions: Legal Perspectives For Business Owners
Author: Rainer Hughes
5. How An Ri Divorce Lawyer Can Simplify Your Separation Process
Author: Law Office of John R. Grasso
6. How To Handle A Slip And Fall Case In Minnesota: A Comprehensive Guide Of Hiring A Lawyer
Author: sussmanlaw
7. Uk Spouse Visa Processing Time: Updated
Author: The SmartMove2UK
8. How A Minnesota Dog Bite Accident Attorney Can Help You Seek Justice
Author: sussmanlaw
9. Legal Remedies For Cyber Crime In India – Advocate Deepak
Author: Advocate Deepak
10. Legal Remedies For Cyber Crime: Advocate Deepak's Expertise
Author: Advocate Deepak
11. Mitigating Consequences For First-time Offenders: Defense Lawyers On Keeping Records Clean
Author: glennrroderman
12. The Benefits Of Hiring A Collective Bargaining Attorney In Nyc
Author: indexblogger
13. Interview Waiver For Us Visa Renewal - Everything You Need To Know
Author: Hardik Shah
14. Dui Lawyer Dinwidde Va
Author: Dui Lawyer Dinwidde VA
15. The Evolution Of Content Marketing For Law Firms: Trends And Innovations
Author: jamewilliams