ALL >> Legal >> View Article
Qld Permitting Use Of A Place -s11dma
What the Law states - Permitting Use Of A Place - S11 Drugs Misuse Act
Section 11(1) of the Drugs Misuse Act 1986 provides that
1. A person who, being the occupier or concerned in the management or control of a place, permits the place to be used for the commission of a crime defined in this part is guilty of a crime.
What the Police must prove - Permitting Use Of A Place - S11 Drugs Misuse Act
In order for the Police to prove their case at Court, they must prove each of the following matters beyond a reasonable doubt.
1. That the accused was the "occupier concerned in the management or control" of a place. As to occupation, an accused must be making use of a place with enough defacto control or management of the place to enable that use. A person is not an occupier if his/her only connection is the presence of some belongings. Mere ownership is also not sufficient and personal involvement must be proved.
2. That the accused "permitted." Standing by and watching somebody else doing something does not always establish permission. However, neither is specific activity always necessary ...
... to prove "permitting". It will be a question of fact and degree as to the degree of collusion.
3. Used for the commission of a drug offence under the act. The prosecution will be required to prove the drugs offence under one of the other sections of the act. For example, to be guilty of permitting the use of a place to produce a dangerous drug, it must first be proven that the dangerous drug was produced in contravention of section 8 of the Drugs Misuse Act. Note that under subsection 11(2) of the Drugs Misuse Act the dangerous drug to which the commission of a crime relates is the dangerous drug directly or indirectly involved and in relation to which proof is required to establish the commission of the crime.
It will be necessary for the Police in every offence to prove that the accused was the person who committed the offence.
Possible Defences - Permitting Use Of A Place - S11 Drugs Misuse Act
Possible defences to this offence include but are not limited to:
1. Not sufficient control or management to establish occupation
2. Lack of sufficient involvement to constitute "permission"
3. Lack of knowledge as to the commission of the offence under the DMA
4. duress
The defendant was not an occupier of the place or had no management of the place.
If you are interested to know something more on Use of a place for drugs - S10DMA and other details,you are welcome to the Drug Charges site.
Add Comment
Legal Articles
1. Iim Bangalore, Iit Madras Release Joint Report On India’s Evolving Startup Incubation LandscapeAuthor: Dev kumar
2. How Non-canadians Can Enter The Us From Canada
Author: Hardik Shah
3. Cyber Crime Lawyer In Ahmedabad - Advocate Deepak: Leading Expertise In Digital Justice
Author: Advocate Deepak
4. Us Visa Interview Waiver - Know In And Out
Author: Hardik Shah
5. From Suffering To Success: How To Find Your Belmar Slip And Fall Lawyer
Author: blognerdzone
6. Best Cyber Crime Lawyer In Noida – Advocate Deepak
Author: Advocate Deepak
7. Importance Of Business Reforms Action Plan 2024 For Ease Of Doing Business
Author: Dev kumar
8. 2026 Diversity Visa Lottery Opens For 55,000 Green Cards
Author: Berd & Klauss, PLLC
9. Canadian Citizenship Police Certificate: A Detailed Guide
Author: Hardik Shah
10. How Long Do You Have To File An Injury Claim In Dallas County: A Comprehensive Guide
Author: Morgan Scott
11. Essential Advice For Divorce In The Uk: What To Expect From Your Lawyer
Author: Rainer Hughes
12. Bail Lawyer In Cyber Crime Case In Delhi – Advocate Deepak: Your Trusted Legal Partner
Author: Advocate Deepak
13. Chicago Personal Injury Lawyers
Author: Paul M. Marriett
14. The Bruner Law Firm
Author: Vince Bruner
15. Bail Lawyer In Cyber Crime Cases In Noida: Advocate Deepak
Author: Advocate Deepak