Joseph Brant And The Hegelian Dialectic

By Author: Robert Bruce Baird
Total Articles: 190
Comment this article

I admit I am only able to provide guesses as to the nature of how the elites might convene or make known to each other the nature of shared interests at different times. I have traveled in some circles where some of these people are present and I may have overheard a few things from others who work for them but it is pure guesswork in the final analysis. The Jacobin Scottish era shows us that Hume, Carlyle and Gibbon where checking with each other and following a plan to minimize the lesser nobles or keep them in the dark. Who did these people report to in the Stuart Royal camp? Bonnie Prince Charlie was opposed by his own general when the French did not send troops as promised so we can wonder if the people like William of Hesse and the De Medicis who appear together shortly after this were involved. Clearly Robespierre fomented a Revolution they needed in order to cleanse over-indulgences of the Royals in France. I am pretty sure that the Hegelian Dialectic borne of the top-down Platonic ideology was a factor. They were playing many sides and some very high personages were left out of the loop.

The Royal Society ...
... included a shadow government and Francis Bacon may have been the actual offspring of Queen Elizabeth. At that time we saw a concentration of the best minds under the auspices of the Stuarts. The Stuarts are the Milesian BEES and so are the Benjaminites like the Rothschilds who got the De Medicis monopoly and spy network. If you put it together it is worth speculating that a few people like Lord Mountbatten and Pierre Dupont de Nemours are in a position to make or influence decisions. To what degree they get manipulated by their own paladins and how far the conflicts in their own midst go is the big question mark.

The head people of the Priory of Sion were often from the alchemists in the Royal Society so we can speculate that an inner group of people there were of great importance. When Dan Brown (Author of The Da Vinci Code) had the tie in to Roslyn and the Sinclair Stewarts there he was making a similar guess to what I am saying.

The use of myths like the Grail legend or other religious denominations they have allowed the Masons to start (Mormons, Scientology, Billy Graham and fundamentalism, Calvin, Luther and all the rest) are mirrored in the Hindu Tradition. They were always in touch with that part of the world and China. The Tarim Basin was once a central area that their top people resided. The Basilidae of Hecateus' family and the Basilians who derive therefrom as well as the Nestorians are evidence of this in the Greco-Roman to recent era.
In America they had the Toltecs and Mediwiwin who were not always willing to toe the line just as the Ptolemies like Juba had been unwilling to go along with the major power grabs and Brutus was doing to Caesar. These things require a lot of reading and researching and I have done the bulk of the work to make these things into a continuous and reasonable guess at true history.

Thus it often crosses my mind and I have to tell people who are into some of the ‘Conspiracy Theories' such as Jesuits, Rothschilds and the rest; that it has always been the case for the last 5,000 years James Joyce dubbed a ‘nightmare'. It is not one group all on their own, and it is not new. They have tried to let people take part in their own education and government but often this back-fired. I can defend many of the things they have done. The time for true change is upon us however.

Could the 'hide the ball' campaign or technique that keeps our attention away from the real problem and lack of freedom, such as the 'Red Scare' (Palmer Raids) or spread of communism be taken over by anti-smoking and ecology? I'm sure the people in the trenches of these battles are good people who have no ulterior motive. But my question is worth thinking about on the road to establishing priorities, I hope. The highest level of engineering where the greatest evolution has occurred might be in the field of 'social engineering' and polite political intrigue. This is one area of human development that I see no ancient gift and intent to develop into greater adeptness, until the myth-making of the Mediterranean patriarchs or what Jung calls the 'Ur-stories'. From that point forward things have taken a far more Synarchistic tyrannical turn. The relationship of Onassis and Winston Churchill is one that I find most intriguing but no greater than the Iroquois roots of the Randolphs or Churchills. The Indian name of Joseph Brant tells us his father understood what position his son would have to take.

In the tradition of the Mediwiwin Society of pre-Columbian Masons in America and the genetically proven Sioux to Iroquois Haplogroup X trackers showing they are white, we have Joseph Brant who is a proud Mason. Churchill is related to him; and because Churchill was also a Druid and Mason among other things including the Rhodes outgrowth of Illuminism, it gets interesting to see this. Of course, one must remember that Thomas Paine said Masonry is based on the 'sun' {son} worship of Druidry and that the Adams Dragons are in this too. This is taken from the respected official Masonic site of British Columbia and the Yukon.

1742 - November 2, 1807

The Mohawk Thayendanegea, also known as Joseph Brant, served as Principle Chief of the Six Nations Indians, a Christian missionary of the Anglican church, and a British military officer during the U.S. War of Independence.

Brant was born in 1742 near what is now Akron, Ohio and given the Mohawk name of Thayendanegea, meaning "he places two bets." {N.B.} He inherited the status of Mohawk Chief from his father.

A student of Latin and Greek, he helped translate Mark's Gospel into Mohawk. With the help of the Iroquois, he fought for the British against the American colonists. After the war he led his people to what is now Ontario, Canada. Joseph Brant died in Burlington, Upper Canada on November 2, 1807.
The story of his rescuing a Continental soldier may be apocryphal. (6)
"Apocryphal" perhaps but it is also evidence of his connection with a media spin which makes his people accepted on both sides.

The abuse of people who once worked with the traders in pre-Columbian times is evident allover the world. In such dispersed place as the Aleutians, New Zealand, Newfoundland and Easter Island I have documented the total genocide of Beothuk, Moriori, and others. The Iroquois made a ghastly bargain and tried to eliminate the Hurons who they had lived with or near for millennia. They accepted the Dutch muskets and almost completed the job that disease borne by De Soto and Columbus had not done in northern regions where contact with European diseases had been going on continuously. This abuse or genocide includes the Irish and Ukrainians as well as the Jewish and you will find the very same families on the receiving end i9f they are no longer rich or powerful. Jonathan Swift was a Hibernian gifted in Green Languages but he was also an able craftsman of legal or other tongue and paper produce. He supported the Irish as the English were intent on using the issuance of coin to prevent Irish merchants and traders from competing. Here is a little of the matter for your consideration.

'To give, therefore, a short view of our case, it is thus; We can have English coin but by stealth, there being an act of parliament forbidding the exportation of English coin; if, therefore, we should send our gold or silver to England to be coined, we cannot have it back again, or if we could, we cannot keep it for the reason above; we cannot for the same reason have foreign silver; let us add to these, that by the act of navigation and other acts, we cannot make our markets of buying where we make our markets for selling; though we might have the commodities we want much cheaper there, than we can have them in England, viz. all East India and Turkey goods, with many others: nor is it to be expected that any nation will trade with us with their silver only, when we will not
exchange commodities with them.

Except, therefore, England designs entirely to ruin Ireland, a kingdom by which it is demonstrable that she gains yearly thirteen or fourteen hundred thousand pounds, she ought to think of giving us some relief.' ("History of St. Patrick's," pp. xciii-xciv). [T.S.]] (7)

I am reminded again of the first Inspirational Comment that I began this book with - Let me issue and control a nation's money and I care not who writes the laws. - Mayer Amschel Rothschild.


About the Author Author of Diverse Druids
Columnist for The ES Press Magazzine
Guest 'expert' at World-Mysteries.com