Long Island Ride-share Accidents: Are You Protected?

By Author: Jason Tenenbaum
Total Articles: 3
Comment this article

Ride-sharing services have transformed how Long Island residents get around, with use more than tripling across the New York metro area since 2019. While Uber and Lyft offer undeniable convenience, their rise has introduced new legal hurdles for accident victims. Collisions involving these services often involve tangled insurance coverage disputes, corporate legal teams, and nuanced liability questions that demand specialized legal guidance.
Unlike standard car accidents, ride-share cases involve layered insurance coverage policies, debates over driver employment status, and tech companies with extensive legal resources. These factors create a maze of challenges that can leave injured parties feeling overwhelmed.
The Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum, P.C. focuses exclusively on helping Long Island residents navigate these cases. Our team combines insights from personal injury law, insurance regulations, and tech industry practices to protect clients’ ...
... rights in this evolving legal space.

Breaking Down Ride-Share Accident Claims
How Ride-Share Operations Impact Liability
Ride-share platforms operate differently than traditional taxi services. Drivers use personal vehicles and work as independent contractors rather than employees. This structure creates shifting insurance coverage depending on the driver’s activity:

App active, no ride accepted: Basic liability coverage
En route to passenger: Increased coverage
Passenger in vehicle: Maximum coverage (often $1 million)

These coverage tiers mean a driver checking their phone for fares in a Mineola parking lot has different protections than one transporting a passenger along the Northern State Parkway.
Frequent Causes of Collisions
While some accident causes mirror standard crashes, ride-share incidents often involve unique factors:

Phone distraction: Drivers frequently toggle between GPS, ride alerts, and passenger messages
Exhaustion: Many work extended shifts across multiple apps to maximize earnings
Unfamiliar routes: Drivers new to areas like the South Shore may make sudden turns or missed stops
Rushed pickups: Illegal stops in high-traffic zones like Roosevelt Field Mall
Poor vehicle upkeep: Personal cars used commercially often lack proper maintenance

In one Nassau County case, a fatigued Uber driver working a 14-hour shift ran a red light near Hofstra University, causing a multi-car collision. Our team used driver logs to prove excessive work hours contributed to the crash, securing compensation for injured passengers.

Untangling Liability and Insurance Challenges
Who’s Responsible?
Multiple parties may share fault in ride-share accident claims:

Drivers: Personal liability for negligent actions (e.g., speeding, distraction)
Companies: Uber/Lyft may face liability if safety protocols are inadequate
Other motorists: Third-party drivers who cause collisions
Vehicle makers: Defective parts or software issues

A critical factor is the driver’s status during the incident. For example, if the app was off, only the driver’s personal insurance applies. If actively transporting a rider, the company’s $1 million policy typically activates.
Insurance Complexities
New York’s no-fault system adds layers to ride-share accident claims:

Coverage gaps: Drivers may lack proper insurance during “app on” periods
Policy conflicts: Personal insurers often deny claims involving commercial use
Multiple insurers: Juggling personal, ride-share, and third-party policies
Inadequate limits: Severe injuries often exceed basic coverage amounts

Our attorneys recently resolved a case where both the driver’s insurer and the ride-share company initially denied a claim. By proving the driver was mid-ride, we compelled the company’s insurer to cover a client’s $450,000 medical bills.

How Our Firm Approaches Ride-Share Cases
Building Strong Claims
Our team employs tailored strategies for these cases:

Immediate evidence preservation: Securing app data, driver logs, and vehicle black box records
Multi-policy analysis: Identifying all applicable insurance coverage
Corporate accountability: Investigating company safety practices and driver screening
Expert collaboration: Working with accident reconstructionists and medical specialists

In a recent Suffolk County lawsuit, we obtained Lyft’s driver fatigue reports showing our client’s operator had multiple warnings about excessive shift lengths. This evidence proved critical in overcoming corporate pushback.
Overcoming Common Hurdles
Ride-share cases present unique obstacles we routinely address:

Disappearing evidence: App data can be altered or deleted without swift action
Corporate stonewalling: Companies often delay producing safety records or driver histories
Statutory thresholds: New York’s “serious injury” requirement demands precise medical documentation
Lowball offers: Insurers exploit victims’ unfamiliarity with layered policies

We countered these tactics in a Garden City case by subpoenaing the driver’s phone records, which showed they were texting while navigating a passenger through rush-hour traffic on the LIE.

Emerging Trends in Ride-Share Litigation
Legal Shifts Impacting Cases
Recent developments are reshaping this legal landscape:

Stricter data laws: Courts now order companies to preserve driver location and app usage records
Safety mandates: New state rules require detailed driver background checks
Coverage reforms: Legislators are closing insurance loopholes during “app on” periods
Worker status battles: Lawsuits challenging independent contractor classifications could shift liability to companies

A 2023 appellate decision forced Uber to release five years of collision reports from Long Island, revealing patterns of underreported incidents at major hubs like MacArthur Airport.
Technology’s Growing Role
Upcoming changes will further complicate these cases:

Self-driving cars: Accidents may involve software defects rather than human error
Driver monitoring: In-cabin cameras raise privacy concerns but provide collision evidence
AI dispatch systems: Courts may hold companies liable for dangerous route recommendations

Our firm stays ahead of these trends through ongoing education and tech partnerships, ensuring we can handle next-generation ride-share disputes.

Why Timely Action Matters
New York’s three-year statute of limitations for personal injury claims applies to ride-share cases, but waiting risks:

Lost evidence (overwritten app data, deleted messages)
Fading witness memories
Expired insurance claim windows

In a recent Queens case, we secured security footage from a Hicksville 7-Eleven that showed our client’s Uber driver ran a stop sign—footage that was deleted 30 days later.

Partner With a Specialist
Ride-share accident claims demand attorneys who understand both traffic law and tech-driven corporate defense tactics. The Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum, P.C. has recovered millions for Long Island clients through:

Aggressive evidence gathering
Corporate policy analysis
Strategic negotiations with insurers
Trial readiness that pushes parties to settle fairly

If you’ve been injured in a ride-share collision, contact us at 516-750-0595 or intake@jtnylaw.com within 24 hours to protect your rights. Early intervention helps preserve critical evidence and strengthens your position.
This content provides general information. Case outcomes depend on specific facts and require professional legal review.