Differences Between Certification Standards Iso/iec 17065 And Iso/iec 17024

By Author: Emma
Total Articles: 57
Comment this article

ISO certificates serve as of quality standards in a world where standards and quality are essential to success. Organizations pursuing certification are frequently confused by misconceptions about the multitude of ISO standards. The purpose of this article is to clarify the differences between ISO/IEC 17065 and ISO/IEC 17024, two particular standards.

While ISO/IEC 17024 establishes standards for human certification procedures, ISO/IEC 17065 specifies the standards for product certification bodies, guaranteeing fairness and uniformity. To increase credibility and competency, it is essential for professionals and enterprises to understand these distinctions. The upcoming parts will examine the fundamentals of each standard, compare them in detail, offer implementation solutions, and share real-world case studies, all of which will lead to practical insights for individuals that are discussing certification.

To Know the ISO 17065 Standard
While ISO/IEC 17024 establishes standards for human certification procedures, ISO/IEC 17065 specifies the standards for product certification bodies, guaranteeing fairness ...
... and uniformity. To increase credibility and competency, professionals and enterprises need to understand these distinctions. The upcoming parts will examine the fundamentals of each standard, compare them in detail, offer implementation solutions, and share real-world case studies, all of which will lead to practical insights for individuals that are discussing certification. Well-written and structured ISO 17065 documents are essential for the product certification body to obtain ISO 17065 accreditation.

To Know the ISO 17024 Standard
Globally recognized ISO 17024 “Conformity Assessment – General requirements for bodies operating certification of persons,” establishes standards for organizations that certify individuals for a range of professions and occupations. The goal is to integrity, comparability, and recognition of certified personnel globally by ensuring consistent, comparable, and dependable certification processes across industries and nations. With an emphasis on the procedures followed by certifying organizations, the standard seeks to foster public and consumer trust in certified professionals while fostering confidence in the certification process through fairness and uniformity.

A Comprehensive Analysis of ISO/IEC 17065 and ISO/IEC 17024
Scope and Relevance: Organizations that carry out product certification, which verifies that goods fulfil particular standards, are primarily covered by ISO/IEC 17065. Various industries, including consumer goods, food safety, and manufacturing, use this standard. ISO 17024, on the other hand, deals with personnel certification and is used to verify a person's proficiency in a particular function or profession, usually in technical and professional sectors.

General Requirements: Both standards underline how crucial it is to manage issues of interest and be impartial to preserve the integrity of the certification process. However, according to ISO/IEC 17065, certification organizations must also control the legal and contractual risks connected to the product certification process. ISO/IEC 17024 focuses on the particular requirements for the persons being certified in terms of data protection and confidentiality.

The Structural Requirements: The primary areas of difference between the organizational structures under ISO/IEC 17065 and ISO/IEC 17524 are roles and responsibilities related to the certification scopes of each standard. In comparison with ISO/IEC 17024, which specifies processes that defend the interests of certified individuals, ISO/IEC 17065 calls for a committee to ensure objectivity in product certification decisions.

Needs for Resources: Resources appropriate for the particular product certification, such as test facilities, are required by ISO/IEC 17065, whereas ISO/IEC 17024 requires that certification process staff be carefully evaluated to guarantee competency.

Requirements for the Certification Process: The application, evaluation, and decision-making process for ISO/IEC 17065 product certification are focused on the market, periodic and product surveillance. Individuals are evaluated under ISO 17024, necessitating the use of various approaches for examination, re-examination, and surveillance tasks associated with preserving the personnel’s certification status.

System Requirements for Management: According to these criteria, an efficient management system that includes management reviews and internal audits is necessary. Both also require document control and record-keeping, but the specifics of these requirements are tailored to the procedures and structures unique to personnel or product certification by their particular standards.

Strategies for Putting ISO/IEC 17065 and 17024 into Practice
It takes a systematic approach to implement ISO/IEC 17065, which deals with the requirements for certification bodies certifying goods, services, and processes, and ISO/IEC 17024, which deals with the certification of individuals. The following are some methods for putting both criteria into practice:
• Gap Analysis: Conduct a comprehensive comparison between the requirements of the standard and current operations. To determine the extent of the necessary modifications, identify the areas of non-conformance for both ISO/IEC 17065 and ISO/IEC 17024.
• Action Plan: Create a thorough strategy to fill in these deficiencies. Assign roles, establish due dates, and allot funds for things like ISO 17024 training, process modifications, and document preparation.
• Training: Develop training programs that are specific to ISO/IEC 17065 requirements for personnel certification and ISO/IEC 17024 requirements for staff involved in product, process, and service certification.
• Internal Audits: Plan and carry out audits regularly to evaluate adherence to the requirements. Utilize outcomes to motivate ongoing development.
• Management Review: To make sure the system is still efficient and in line with the organization's strategic direction, top management should examine its performance regularly.
• Documents: Create or update quality manuals, procedures, and ISO 17024 documents that adhere to standards. Make sure they are readily available and kept in a secure location.
To guarantee preparedness for the official certification assessment procedure, think about planning pre-assessment visits, doing mock audits, and hiring consultants if necessary.

Source Link: https://accreditationconsultancy.wordpress.com/