4 Important Api Portfolio Considerations For Payments Companies

By Author: sifip
Total Articles: 686
Comment this article

Payments companies that manage expanding API landscapes must consider all of the moving parts. Here are four critical API portfolio considerations to keep in mind.

Managing and supporting an API program within an online payment gateway organization frequently necessitates significant change. Choosing the types of APIs that will comprise the API portfolio, managing API lifecycles, and developing an API governance model are all critical considerations for payments companies in order to achieve their strategic goals while removing potential roadblocks.

This article examines four critical API considerations for organizations managing API portfolios, including how to manage APIs both as individuals and as a portfolio.

1. Types of APIs
Payments companies that are just getting started with an API program may want to minimize variance across API formats. Limiting variety and sticking to similar implementation and design details for APIs can help teams focus on functionality rather than debating different implementation ideologies. As an API portfolio expands and teams and programs mature, it will almost certainly ...
... become necessary to diversify an API landscape to accommodate special use cases and customer needs. Emerging technologies and changing preferences will necessitate a more nuanced API landscape over time. Keep an eye on governance and design guidance for key indicators that it's time to add variety; when the two appear to be at odds, it may be time to update guidelines.

2. Number of APIs
Similarly to variety, the number of published APIs will typically begin small and be managed seamlessly from a centralized location. This central source will most likely not scale as an organization's number of services grows and the API program matures. Instead, review, approval, and management responsibilities will most likely be shared by a larger group of engineers and software architects. Organizations must adapt guidelines and governance as the number of APIs grows and the management circle expands.

3. Insights into APIs
As an API portfolio and program mature, it becomes more difficult to gain insights and maintain visibility across the entire ecosystem. Certain insights, for example, should be tracked over time:
The time it takes from the conception of a service to its implementation.

What services are available, and how can those services be linked?

Each API's performance and success
Tracking these insights can assist teams in determining when certain APIs should be retired or updated. This, like the other considerations, becomes more complicated as the API landscape expands. To manage and monitor service performance and deployment status, what may begin as spreadsheet tracking and gateway logs will most likely need to evolve into an automated process that includes real-time reporting.

4. Governance of APIs
Depending on the complexity of the best online payment gateway company's API organization, governance may need to be separated into distinct categories to ensure that APIs deliver the intended value while avoiding conflict. This article explains how categorizing API governance into four categories can help to alleviate any conflict between goals. These four categories are as follows:

API program governance: This includes developing the overall API strategy and ensuring that it aligns with the organization's business goals and organizational dynamics. This initiative is usually led by API program leadership or an API "Center for Enablement" (C4E).

API product governance: API product governance includes individual API lifecycle management to ensure they continue to meet business objectives by measuring API products against the business model. API product managers are typically in charge of API product governance.

API portfolio governance:API portfolio governance is concerned with managing an organization's superset of API products to ensure that product teams are not duplicating efforts or exposing vulnerabilities, and that developer experiences remain consistent. Early-stage API portfolio governance is typically the responsibility of C4E.

API platform governance:This area of governance focuses on enforcing policies for the other three buckets of governance as well as leveraging automation and digital capabilities to improve operational resilience, security, and stability. In the early stages, C4E also takes ownership of this category.

Because conflict is more likely to occur between these areas (rather than within them), categorizing them can help in the development of holistic API governance model that minimizes friction while maintaining clear ownership roles.

Whether an organization manages a few APIs or hundreds or thousands, difficulties will arise. Being aware of the considerations outlined above can help a company's growth and efficiency as it adds more APIs and teams to the ecosystem.