123ArticleOnline Logo
Welcome to 123ArticleOnline.com!
ALL >> Writing >> View Article

How To Structure Your Table For Systematic Review And Meta-analysis – Pubrica

Profile Picture
By Author: Pubrica
Total Articles: 96
Comment this article
Facebook ShareTwitter ShareGoogle+ ShareTwitter Share

Introduction
In some aspects, systematic reviews vary from conventional narrative reviews. Narrative reviews are mostly descriptive, do not require a systematic search of the literature, and concentrate on a subset of studies in a field selected based on availability or author preference. As a result, although narrative reviews are informative, they often include an element of selection bias.As the name implies, systematic reviews usually include a thorough and comprehensive plan and search strategy derived a priori to minimise bias by finding, evaluating, and synthesising all related studies on a given subject. A meta-analysis aspect is often used in systematic reviews, which entails using statistical techniques to synthesise data from several studies into a single quantitative estimation or summary effect size.

Need of systemic review and meta-analysis:
There are several reasons for performing a systematic review and meta-analysis:
 It may assist in resolving discrepancies in results published by individual studies that may include bias or errors.
 It may help identify areas in a field ...
... where there is a lack of evidence and areas where further research should be conducted.
 It allows the combination of findings from different studies, highlighting new findings relevant to practice or policy.
 It may be able to reduce the need for additional trials.
Writing a systematic review and meta-analysis will help identify a researcher's field of interest since they are published in high-impact journals and receive many citations.

Phases to planning a systematic review and meta-analysis
The succeeding components to a successful systematic review and meta-analysis writing are:
• Formulate the Review Question
The first stage involves describing the review topic, formulating hypotheses, and developing a title for the review. It's usually best to keep titles as short and descriptive as possible by following this formula: Intervention for those with a disease (e.g., Dialectical behaviour therapy for adolescent females with a borderline personality disorder).
• Define inclusion and exclusion criteria
The PICO (or PICOC) acronym stands for population, intervention, comparison, outcomes (and context). It can help ensure that all main components are decided upon before beginning the study. Authors must, for example, choose their population age range, circumstances, results, and type(s) of interventions and control groups a priori. It's also crucial to determine what types of experiments to include and exclude (e.g., RCTs only, RCTs and quasi-experimental designs, qualitative research), the minimum number of participants in each group, published and unpublished studies, and language restrictions.
• Develop a search strategy and locate studies
This is where a reference librarian can be particularly beneficial in assisting with the creation and execution of electronic searches. To recognise all applicable trials in a given region, it is essential to create a detailed list of key terms (i.e., "MeSH" terms) related to each component of PICOC. The secret to creating an effective search strategy is to strike a balance between sensitivity and precision.
• Selection of studies
After retrieving and reviewing a detailed list of abstracts, any studies that tend to satisfy inclusion requirements will be collected and thoroughly reviewed. To ensure inter-raterreliability, this procedure is usually carried out by at least two reviewers. It is suggested that authors maintain a list of all checked research, including reasons for inclusion or exclusion. It might be possible to hire study authors to collect missing data for data pooling (e.g., means, standard deviations). It's also possible that translations will be needed.
• Extract data
To organise the information extracted from each reviewed study (e.g., authors, publication year, number of participants, age range, study design, results, included/excluded), building and using a basic data extraction type or chart can be beneficial.

• Assess study quality
In recent years, there has been a push to improve the consistency of each RCT included in systematic reviews. Double-blinding, which is acceptable for clinical trials but not for psychological or non-pharmacological treatments, significantly impacts this metric. Other more detailed guidelines and criteria, such as the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT), as well as articles with recommendations for improving quality in RCTs and meta-analyses for psychological intervention, are available(4).
• Analyse and Interpret results
The Review Manager (RevMan) software, endorsed by the Cochrane Collaboration, is one example of a statistical programme that can measure effect sizes for meta-analysis. The effect sizes are given, along with a 95 percent confidence interval (CI) range, and are presented in both quantitative and graphical form (e.g., forest plots). Each trial is visually represented as a horizontal diamond shape in forest plots. The middle represents the effect size (e.g., SMD) and the endpoints representing both ends of the CI.
• Disseminate findings
Since the Cochrane Collaboration's reviews are published in the online Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, they are often lengthy and comprehensive. As a result, it is possible and encouraged to publish abbreviated versions of the review in other applicable scholarly journals; indeed, engaging in a review update or joining a well-established review team may be a beneficial way to get involved in the systematic review process.
Future scope
The systematic review's findings should be discussed in terms of the strength of evidence and shortcomings of the initial research used for the review. It's also necessary to discuss the review's weaknesses, the results' applicability (generalizability), and the findings' implications for patient care, public health, and future clinical research.
Continue Reading: https://bit.ly/3AeFIYY
For our services: https://pubrica.com/services/research-services/systematic-review/

Why Pubrica:
When you order our services, We promise you the following – Plagiarism free | always on Time | 24*7 customer support | Written to international Standard | Unlimited Revisions support | Medical writing Expert | Publication Support | Biostatistical experts | High-quality Subject Matter Experts.

Contact us:     
Web: https://pubrica.com/ 
Blog: https://pubrica.com/academy/ 
Email: sales@pubrica.com 
WhatsApp : +91 9884350006 
United Kingdom: +44-1618186353

More About the Author

Pubrica is premier online editing, publication and writing guidance & assistance services based in the UK and India. A global leader in comprehensive manuscript publication support service for academic and scientific journals and articles, we provide a wide range of services that include academic, scientific, business, medical, and technology, regulatory writing, Clinical Report Forms (CRF), biostatistics, manuscripts, business writing, physician reports, thesis, medical writing, and more. We assist medical doctors, students, hospitals, pharma, and device manufacturers in their quest for a credible writing partner. Our team of experts consists of over 200 academic luminaries, industry veterans in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) and medicine who work on 170 topics of research. All writers are certified by American Medical Writing Association (AMWA) and the European Medical Writing Association (EMWA). OUR SERVICES ARE: 1. Scientific Medical Writing Services - http://pubrica.com/services/physician-writing-services/ 2. Scientific Editing Services - http://pubrica.com/sevices/editing-and-translation/ 3. Scientific Publication Support Services - http://pubrica.com/services/publication-support/ 4. Scientific Research Support Services - http://pubrica.com/sevices/research-services/ 5.Scientific Communication Support Services - http://pubrica.com/sevices/scientific-communication/ 6. Biostatistical Programming Services - http://pubrica.com/services/research-services/biostatistics-and-statistical-programming-services/ Contact: United kingdom : +44-1143520021 india : +91 9884350006 Visit : http://pubrica.com/ Email : sales@pubrica.com

Total Views: 231Word Count: 906See All articles From Author

Add Comment

Writing Articles

1. Top Benefits Of Using A Free Tarot Card Reading App
Author: astrosir

2. Power Of Motivational Quotes
Author: Motivation Gyan

3. The Impact Of Sap Erp Solutions: Real-time Insights And Success Stories
Author: sagar

4. Revolutionizing Scientific Writing: Take Smarter Notes, Faster
Author: Online Writer

5. Merry Christmas Eve
Author: Motivation Gyan

6. Beyond The Benchmark: Leveraging Reverse Engineering For A Winning Product Strategy
Author: andrew smith

7. Inspirational Life Good Morning Quotes
Author: Motivation Gyan

8. Bangalore's Best Content Writing Professionals Services Agency
Author: italics began as a humble backyard content writing

9. Online Cfd Trading: Your Questions Answered
Author: johnson

10. Content Marketing 101: Create Engaging Content Your Audience Loves
Author: vedpandey

11. Enhancing The Essay Writing Process
Author: Creighton Lyon

12. Cnc Machine Tools Precision Solutions For Modern Manufacturing
Author: Blocktobox

13. Claims Of Racism And Intimidation In Gmc's Actions Against Accuvision Clinic
Author: Wilfred

14. Housing Esa Letter: 5 Key Facts You Must Know
Author: Justin Foley

15. Elevating Accessibility: Streamlining Subtitle Creation For Youtube Creators
Author: Janice Chow

Login To Account
Login Email:
Password:
Forgot Password?
New User?
Sign Up Newsletter
Email Address: