Good Earth Coalition

By Author: alla
Total Articles: 191
Comment this article

The following appeared in a letter to the editor of the Clearview newspaper. " In the next mayoral election, residents of Clearview should vote for Ann Green, who is a member of the Good Earth Coalition, rather than for Frank Braun, a member of the Clearview town council, because the current members are not protecting our environment. For example, during the past year the number of factories in Clearview has doubled, air Hublot Replica pollution levels have increased, and the local hospital has treated 25 percent more patients with respiratory illnesses. If we elect Ann Green, the environmental problems in Clearview will certainly be solved. "

This is a paragraph without coherence, in other words, the logic is unclear and the examples, mentioned in it, isn't closed relevent even not right so this argument is unreasonable. I can learn from the passage that the author opposes voting for Frank Braun and the only reason is, as a current member of the council, he is not protecting their environment. But, I think it is irrational for the author to ...
... give this reason to support his opinion. Because we should judge the candidates by their ability, which is essential for them to develop the city well. The example that the number of factories has doubled is just the right proof to show the council has managed to develop the industry quite well. Therefore, the author fails to prove that Frank Braun is not capable to be a mayor. And then this Cartier Replica Watches paragraph is developed into the conclusion; 'If we elect Ann Green, the environment problems will certainly be solved. " which is not relevent to the other parts. This kind of foolish conclusion with no basis makes this passage more unreasonable.

Actually speaking, the idea that to protect environment is a very strong factor in a working plan of a mayor and Ann Green's advantage by which she can win the citizens over. But owing to lack of coherence and the confusing logic, the author didn't make himself effective and fails to show us that Ann Green is more suitable to be the mayor. Though the idea, the author rises is good, this paragraph is bad organized.